ⓘ Distinction, philosophy. Distinction, the fundamental philosophical abstraction, involves the recognition of difference. In classical philosophy, there were var ..

                                     

ⓘ Distinction (philosophy)

Distinction, the fundamental philosophical abstraction, involves the recognition of difference.

In classical philosophy, there were various ways in which things could be distinguished. The merely logical or virtual distinction, such as the difference between concavity and convexity, involves the mental apprehension of two definitions, but which cannot be realized outside the mind, as any concave line would be a convex line considered from another perspective. A real distinction involves a level of ontological separation, as when squirrels are distinguished from llamas for no squirrel is a llama, and no llama is a squirrel. A real distinction is thus different than a merely conceptual one, in that in a real distinction, one of the terms can be realized in reality without the other being realized.

Later developments include Duns Scotuss formal distinction, which developed in part out of the recognition in previous authors that there need to be an intermediary between logical and real distinctions.

Some relevant distinctions to the history of Western philosophy include:

  • Necessity and Contingency
  • Inductive and Deductive
                                     

1.1. Distinctions in Contemporary Thought Analytic–synthetic distinction

While there are anticipation of this distinction prior to Kant in the British Empiricists and even further in Scholastic thought, it was Kant who introduced the terminology. The distinction concerns the relation of a subject to its predicate: analytic claims are those in which the subject contains the predicate, as in "All bodies are extended." Synthetic claims bring two concepts together, as in "All events are caused." The distinction was recently called into question by W.V.O. Quine, in his paper "Two Dogmas of Empiricism."

                                     

1.2. Distinctions in Contemporary Thought A priori and a posteriori

The origins of the distinction are less clear, and it concerns the origins of knowledge. A posteriori knowledge arises from, or is caused by, experience. A priori knowledge may come temporally after experience, but its certainty is not derivable from the experience itself. Saul Kripke was the first major think to propose that there are analytic a posteriori knowledge claims.

                                     

2.1. Notable Distinctions in Historical Authors Aristotle

Aristotle makes the distinction between actuality and potentiality. Actuality is a realization of the way a thing could be, while potency refers simply to the way a thing could be. There are two levels to each: matter itself can be anything, and becomes something actually by causes, making it something which then has the ability to be in a certain way, and that ability can then be realized. The matter of an ax can be an ax, then is made into an ax. The ax thereby is able to cut, and reaches a new form of actuality in actually cutting.

                                     

2.2. Notable Distinctions in Historical Authors Aquinas

The major distinction Aquinas makes is that of essence and existence. It is a distinction already in Avicenna, but Aquinas maps the distinction onto the actuality/potentiality distinction of Aristotle, such that the essence of a thing is in potency to the existence of a thing, which is that things actuality.

                                     

2.3. Notable Distinctions in Historical Authors Kant

In Kant, the distinction between appearance and thing-in-itself is foundational to his entire philosophical project. The distinction separates the way a thing appears to us on the one hand, and the way a thing really is.

                                     
  • Distinction distinct or distinctive may refer to: Distinction philosophy the recognition of difference Formal distinction Distinction law a principle
  • The use mention distinction is a foundational concept of analytic philosophy according to which it is necessary to make a distinction between using a
  • the latter. The fact value distinction is closely related to, and derived from, the is ought problem in moral philosophy characterized by David Hume
  • analytic synthetic distinction also called the analytic synthetic dichotomy is a semantic distinction used primarily in philosophy to distinguish propositions
  • In Palamite theology, there is a distinction between the essence ousia and the energies energeia of God. It was first formulated by Gregory Palamas
  • Play media The type token distinction is the difference between naming a class type of objects and naming the individual instances tokens of that
  • Analytic philosophy is a tradition of philosophy that began around the turn of the 20th century and continues to today. Like any philosophical tradition
  • analytic philosophy A. C. Grayling A.P. Martinich Abstract particulars Actualism Alfred Jules Ayer Analysis Analytic - synthetic distinction Analytic philosophy
  • French philosopher Voltaire. In contemporary philosophy a distinction has developed between speculative philosophy of history and critical philisophy of history
  • modality Pierce s type - token distinction Type - token distinction Use mention distinction Vagueness Figures in the philosophy of logic include but are not
  • In scholastic metaphysics, a formal distinction is a distinction intermediate between what is merely conceptual, and what is fully real or mind - independent
  • British philosophy refers to the philosophical tradition of the British people. The native characteristics of British philosophy are these: common sense