ⓘ Category, Kant. In Kants philosophy, a category is a pure concept of the understanding. A Kantian category is a characteristic of the appearance of any object i ..

                                     

ⓘ Category (Kant)

In Kants philosophy, a category is a pure concept of the understanding. A Kantian category is a characteristic of the appearance of any object in general, before it has been experienced. Kant wrote that "They are concepts of an object in general…." Kant also wrote that, "…pure cоncepts of the undеrstanding which apply to objects of intuition in general…." Such a category is not a classificatory division, as the word is commonly used. It is, instead, the condition of the possibility of objects in general, that is, objects as such, any and all objects, not specific objects in particular.

                                     

1. Meaning of "category"

The word comes from the Greek κατηγορία, katēgoria, meaning "that which can be said, predicated, or publicly declared and asserted, about something." A category is an attribute, property, quality, or characteristic that can be predicated of a thing. "…I remark concerning the categories…that their logical employment consists in their use as predicates of objects." Kant called them "ontological predicates."

A category is that which can be said of everything in general, that is, of anything that is an object. John Stuart Mill wrote: "The Categories, or Predicaments - the former a Greek word, the latter its literal translation in the Latin language - were believed to be an enumeration of all things capable of being named, an enumeration by the summa genera highest kind, i.e., the most extensive classes into which things could be distributed, which, therefore, were so many highest Predicates, one or other of which was supposed capable of being affirmed with truth of every nameable thing whatsoever."

Aristotle had claimed that the following ten predicates or categories could be asserted of anything in general: substance, quantity, quality, relation, action, affection passivity, place, time date, position, and state. These are supposed to be the qualities or attributes that can be affirmed of each and every thing in experience. Any particular object that exists in thought must have been able to have the Categories attributed to it as possible predicates because the Categories are the properties, qualities, or characteristics of any possible object in general. The Categories of Aristotle and Kant are the general properties that belong to all things without expressing the peculiar nature of any particular thing. Kant appreciated Aristotles effort, but said that his table was imperfect because … as he had no guiding principle, he merely picked them up as they occurred to him."

The Categories do not provide knowledge of individual, particular objects. Any object, however, must have Categories as its characteristics if it is to be an object of experience. It is presupposed or assumed that anything that is a specific object must possess Categories as its properties because Categories are predicates of an object in general. An object in general does not have all of the Categories as predicates at one time. For example, a general object cannot have the qualitative Categories of reality and negation at the same time. Similarly, an object in general cannot have both unity and plurality as quantitative predicates at once. The Categories of Modality exclude each other. Therefore, a general object cannot simultaneously have the Categories of possibility/impossibility and existence/non–existence as qualities.

Since the Categories are a list of that which can be said of every object, they are related only to human language. In making a verbal statement about an object, a speaker makes a judgment. A general object, that is, every object, has attributes that are contained in Kants list of Categories. In a judgment, or verbal statement, the Categories are the predicates that can be asserted of every object and all objects.

                                     

2. The table of judgments

Kant believed that the ability of the human understanding to think about and know an object is the same as the making of a spoken or written judgment about an object. According to him, "Our ability to judge is equivalent to our ability to think." A judgment is the thought that a thing is known to have a certain quality or attribute. For example, the sentence "The rose is red" is a judgment. Kant created a table of the forms of such judgments as they relate to all objects in general.

This table of judgments was used by Kant as a model for the table of categories. Taken together, these twelvefold tables constitute the formal structure for Kants architectonic conception of his philosophical system.

                                     

3. Schemata

Categories are entirely different from the appearances of objects. According to Kant, in order to relate to specific phenomena, categories must be "applied" through time. The way that this is done is called a schema.

                                     

4. Criticism

Arthur Schopenhauer, in his criticism of the Kantian philosophy, found many errors in Kants use of the Categories of Quality, Quantity, Relation, and Modality. Schopenhauer also noted that in accordance with Kants claim, non-human animals would not be able to know objects. Animals would only know impressions on their sense organs, which Kant mistakenly calls perception.

                                     

5. Bibliography

  • Zweig, Arnulf, edited by, Kant: Philosophical Correspondence 1759–99, University of Chicago Press, 1967
  • Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason, Hackett, 1996, ISBN 0-87220-257-7
  • Palmquist, Stephen, Kants System of Perspectives: An architectonic interpretation of the Critical philosophy, University Press of America, 1993. ISBN 0-8191-8927-8
  • Mill, John Stuart, A System of Logic, University Press of the Pacific, 2002, ISBN 1-4102-0252-6
                                     
  • Categories Aristotle Category Kant Categories Peirce Category Vaisheshika Stoic categories Category theory Equivalence of categories Category
  • Many interpreters of Kant have emphasized the importance of the schematism. If pure concepts of the understanding Kantian Categories and sense perceptions
  • to other similar houses. The category of Substance disappears from Kant s tables, and under the heading of Relation, Kant lists inter alia the three relationship
  • unique interpretation of Kant which places unprecedented emphasis on the schematism of the categories Heidegger began writing Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics
  • philosophy of Immanuel Kant 1724 1804 favoured a classical republican approach. In Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch 1795 Kant listed several conditions
  • the word have and its usage. Category of being Categorization Category Kant Schema Kant Categories Stoic Category disambiguation Simplicius of
  • as Will and Representation 1818 He wanted to show Immanuel Kant s errors so that Kant s merits would be appreciated and his achievements furthered.
  • Kant Yearbook is an annual peer - reviewed academic journal covering the thought of Immanuel Kant published by De Gruyter. It was established in 2009 and
  • philosopher Immanuel Kant in which the author seeks to determine the limits and scope of metaphysics. Also referred to as Kant s First Critique it
  • Krishan Kant 28 February 1927 27 July 2002 was the tenth Vice President of India from 1997 until his death. Previously, he was Governor of Andhra Pradesh
  • the psychological cause of Kant s doctrines of the categories and their schemata. Schopenhauer s analysis holds that Kant misused argument by analogy